Written for: All schools
Community Intelligence turns one address into a report: who lives nearby, which schools already serve them, the community organizations and places to know, and what the site itself carries. It is a lot of numbers, and the mistake founders make is reading them as answers. They are context. This guide walks through each section of the report, says plainly what each number can and cannot establish, works a sample report end to end, and ends with the questions to take into conversations with families and neighbors. The numbers are where your questions start; people supply the answers.
You type one address. The report draws a ring around it (5 miles by default, or a 15-minute drive-time area if you switch) and fills in four layers:
Under those sit the site flags (flood zone, Opportunity Zone, New Markets Tax Credit tract, USDA rural eligibility, road traffic) and, once you have a free account, the written brief: bullet points, each tied to one of the public datasets named in the report's Data Sources card. Without an account you can run one lookup per browser session; a free account adds more lookups, the written brief, and the community organizations list.
What it is: a description of who is nearby today and what already serves them, drawn from public data you can check yourself.
What it is not: an enrollment forecast, a zoning answer, a code answer, or a judgment on whether your budget works. Every one of those depends on your program, your relationships with families, and local decisions no dataset holds. The report hands you better questions. The sections below say which questions each part answers.
The demographics layer comes from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates, at census-tract level, summed for the ring. The report names the vintage it used. The headline is the count of school-age children, ages 5 to 17, living in the ring. The radius cards and age bands underneath also count ages 3 and 4, so they cover ages 3 to 17: 3 and 4, 5 to 11, 12 to 14, and 15 to 17. That is why the radius card reads higher than the headline. Every children figure carries its age range; compare figures with the same range. Income, housing, race, and educational attainment sit beside it, with a trend between two ACS vintages and a 2030 extrapolation the report labels as an estimate.
What it can tell you
What it cannot establish
The schools layer lists the public, charter, and private schools in the ring, from the NCES Common Core of Data (public and charter, with enrollment) and the NCES Private School Universe Survey (private schools, which report no enrollment there). The Map tab's headline strip puts the children count next to the seats enrolled in nearby public and charter schools. The enrollment momentum card shows whether those schools gained or lost students against the prior year, and the brief's EXISTING SCHOOL LANDSCAPE section reads the list for you.
What it can tell you
What it cannot establish
The organizations layer (unlocked with a free account) plots places from a commercial directory, Foursquare, in two groups. The first group is organizations you can walk into and learn from: ask what neighbors value, and how your school could help. Shared space and family outreach can come later, once you are known:
The second group is context, not contacts. A shop, a pediatric office, or a tutoring center shows that a business chose this area. It is not proof of what families spend, how they live, or what education they want. Treat each as a guess to check with people:
What it can tell you: the first draft of a list of people to learn from, and, later, the hosts most likely to have weekday space (churches and community centers above all; see Finding Space for Your Microschool, and School Space Outreach for how to ask a host).
What it cannot establish: whether any of them will take your call, has space, or holds a certificate of occupancy that covers weekday school use. Listings come from a directory, so some have moved or closed, and some places are missing. An empty category means the directory listed none, not that none exist. Ring ahead, and keep the list as a working document you correct as you go. Plan your next community conversation walks through the first call.
These are flags, each from a federal map or program, and each with a named office that can confirm it:
With a free account the report closes with a brief, written by an AI model from the same data, in six fixed sections: who lives here, families this school could serve, the existing school landscape, community organizations and places to know, site conditions, and questions to investigate before committing. Each bullet opens with a short takeaway and ends with the dataset it came from. Two of the sections are actions (the organizations to learn from and the questions); the rest are findings.
This brief is the one piece of the report written by AI inside Space. It is separate from the AI Prompt Guides, which are prompts you copy into your own AI assistant to read your own lease or loan offer.
Three rules govern the brief. It cites only the data in the report, so a bullet with no source is a bullet to distrust. It does not forecast enrollment or judge zoning, code, or whether your budget works. And it is a summary: if a bullet surprises you, go to the card it points at and read the number yourself.
The numbers below are made up to show the method; run your own address for real ones. A founder planning a K-5 school of 120 students looks up an address on the east side of a mid-size city, 5-mile ring.
| Report shows | How to read it | Still to find out |
|---|---|---|
| 7,900 children ages 5-11; count up 4% since the earlier ACS vintage | Thousands of children in the K-5 age band, and the count went up. It is not a count of families who would enroll. | Which tracts hold them; whether growth is new housing or larger families. |
| 11 public and charter schools, 6,100 enrolled; two elementary schools down 180 students combined year over year | Families already have options. Two schools shrinking together is a lead, not a conclusion. | Call the district's enrollment office: boundary change, families moving out, or families choosing elsewhere? |
| Four private schools in the ring, enrollment not reported | The seats count is a floor; private and homeschool families are invisible in it. | Ask each private school its grade span and whether it has a waitlist. |
| Median household income $52,000; nearby schools average 71% free and reduced-price lunch; 19% of households receive SNAP | Title I context. A hypothesis to test: tuition alone may be out of reach for many families here. Area figures do not say what any family could pay. | Ask families what they could pay and what help they would need; confirm Title I treatment of a new school with the state; model revenue in SchoolStack Budget. |
| 9 churches, 2 libraries, 7 daycares, 3 community centers within 2 miles | Organizations to learn from first. Some may later host events or share space. | Call a few; ask what neighbors value and how a school could help. Ask about space only once you are known. |
| Flood Zone X (outside the mapped high-risk area); NMTC tract: yes; Opportunity Zone: no | The map shows lower mapped flood risk. It does not settle insurance cost or whether a lender will ask for flood cover. NMTC is a financing program a lender may know. | Ask an insurance professional: what would flood cover cost here, and would a lender require it? Ask a CDFI whether NMTC reaches a project this size. |
| Address fronts a minor arterial, estimated 12,000 to 18,000 vehicles a day | Visible, and busy at pickup. Drop-off needs a plan. | Stand at the curb at 7:45 and 3:15; ask the city about a loading zone. |
Read together, the report gives facts and questions: thousands of children in the age band, a school landscape in motion, income figures that raise a question about tuition, and organizations to learn from. It does not say the school will fill, what families want, that a school may operate on the parcel, or that the budget works. Those are the next conversations: families and neighbors, the district, and the planning desk.
Nothing in the report replaces twenty conversations with families and neighbors in the ring. Meet them through the organizations you get to know (a daycare parent night, a library program, a congregation), and aim for families across the tracts, not one block. Ask open questions, write down the words they use, and listen for what the report could not see.
Tally the answers against the report. If families name a waitlist the enrollment data could not show, you have learned something. If nobody in twenty interviews would travel to the address, the ring was the wrong shape.
The report's own QUESTIONS TO INVESTIGATE section and next-steps card are built from what it found at your address. In rough order:
No. It reports who lives in the ring and what schools already serve them, from public datasets. How many families enroll depends on your program, your relationships with families, and local factors no dataset captures. Use the report to shape your questions, the organizations you get to know, and your interview plan, then confirm with family interviews.
They measure different things. The children count is residents ages 5 to 17 inside a circle or drive-time area, estimated by the Census Bureau from surveys. District enrollment counts students in particular schools, including students who live outside the ring and excluding residents who attend private school or homeschool. Expect the two to differ. The gap is a question, not an answer.
The ring is a circle of fixed radius around the address. The drive-time area is the ground a car can reach in about 15 minutes on the real road network, so a river or a highway changes its shape. Drive-time is closer to how families actually move. Both are approximations until you ask families how far they would travel.
Yes, as community context with the sources cited, which the report provides. Present it as a description of the neighborhood, not as a demand study, and pair it with your own enrollment evidence: interest lists, interviews, deposits, or waitlist data.
Last reviewed October 24, 2026 by SchoolStack.